BA Health Insurance gets new office building

Sunyani (B/A), Feb. 21, GNA - The National Health Insurance Authorit= y (NHIA) transferred GH¢82,858,317.43 to Brong-Ahafo Region for the payment= of claims by service providers in 2009/2010, Mr Kwadwo Nyamekye Marfo, Brong Ahafo Regional Minister has said.
 
He said in 2009 an amount of GH¢29,802,164.24 was also transferred t= o the scheme in the region, representing 88.38 per cent more than the GH¢15,820,016.30 provided in 2008. Mr Nyamekye Marfo was speaking in Sunyani at the sod-cutting ceremony to commence the construction of a one-storey regional office for the NHIA. He stressed that the project was another commitment of the Government to improve the work of the Authority to enable it to serve the people better. Contracts have been awarded for the construction of offices for the other nine regional schemes, he added. The Regional Minister appealed to the management of the Scheme to reciprocate the efforts of the Government by improving their services to beneficiaries. He asked service providers to also improve the delivery of accessible and quality health-care to the people and advised them against falsificatio= n of claims and to ensure the timely submission of claims to facilitate the prompt release of funds. Mr Nyamekye Marfo expressed the hope that quality work would be done b= y the construction firm, Yanator Ghana Limited, a Wa-based building company t= o achieve value for money.
 
Mr Foster Agyei Korang, Regional Manager of the Authority, gave assurance the consultants and the contractor would use quality materials to execute the project within the expected duration of completion. He disclosed that the project would cost about GH¢650,000.
READ MORE - BA Health Insurance gets new office building

Health insurance window closing for California kids

Congress and California stepped up to the plate in a big way last year for children with pre-existing health conditions.
 
Parents who don't qualify for Healthy Families or Medi-Cal must now do their part. They have until March 1 to sign up their children for health insurance programs before the open enrollment period closes. It would be a travesty for parents to ignore this golden opportunity so many fought so hard to achieve.
 
Failure to sign up means parents can't take advantage of any insurance price break until their child's next birthday.
 
The federal government last year initiated reforms forbidding health insurers to deny coverage to children with chronic conditions, such as asthma or diabetes. California's Legislature took that one step further by forcing insurers to offer premiums that are no more than double the rate of covering healthy children.
 
If health insurers had any doubt about California's commitment to insuring children, Los Angeles Assemblyman Mike Feuer's AB 2244 made the state's position perfectly clear. The legislation, signed last fall by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, bans health insurers from selling policies to anyone for five years if they refuse to sell policies for children.
 
An estimated 500,000 California children have pre-existing conditions, although many have some form of coverage through their parents' insurance policies. It's unclear how many of the remaining uninsured children in California
Advertisement
have yet to take advantage of this option. Advocates in Silicon Valley fear the number may be high, and even one is too many.
 
Children who have health insurance see doctors far more often than those who are uninsured. It's an established fact that children who do not have coverage are:
 
# 3 times more likely to have gone without needed medications.
 
# 5 times more likely to use an emergency room in place of a regular place of care.
 
# 10 times more likely to not have a pediatrician who serves as their regular family physician.
 
Children who don't get help for routine problems often wind up at places like Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, where the cost of care -- too often paid by taxpayers -- is thousands of dollars higher than a routine doctor visit.
 
The California Center for Public Health Advocacy reports that one out of every three school children in the state is overweight. Three out of every four overweight children become overweight adults, and the cost of treating the obese in California in 2010 is already estimated at $28 billion. The expense will only grow as the state's overweight children grow into adulthood.
 
The other worrisome and costly health concern for children is asthma. California kids missed nearly 2 million days of school last year because of asthma-related issues.
 
Parents who care about their children's education also must do everything they can to provide regular health care.
 
The two are related: Healthy children are more alert and comfortable in school and nearly always will outperform kids who come to school sick or in pain.
 
Besides, doesn't every child deserve basic health care? This is the time for parents to step up and get them registered -- and for community health advocates to keep up the good work of spreading the word.
READ MORE - Health insurance window closing for California kids

RBS goes for broke with business insurance grab

The bank's insurance arm - one of the largest players in the market - said it was merely trying to "provide support in challenging times".
 
The statement came after competitors accused it of undercutting the market in a bid to bulk-up prior to a sale or stock market flotation.
 
The bank's commercial insurance arm NIG has written to brokers offering to undercut competitor's premiums by up to 5pc and increase commissions by 3pc in order to win new business.
 
The "Guaranteed to Beat" deal, which runs throughout March and April, is targeting competitors including Ageas, Aviva and RSA and also offers other incentives to brokers such as M&S vouchers and Apple iPads.
 
Rivals have attacked the move and called it "over-the-cliff madness from a taxpayer-owned company".
 
Related Articles
 
 
 
RBS has been ordered to sell or float a string of assets by European regulators after it received billions of pounds of taxpayers' money at the height of the financial crisis. A spokesman for RBS denied that the offer is unreasonable: "We make no apology for providing innovative support to SMEs and supporting our customers in challenging times. This is a profitable product in a niche market."
 
However, other insurers say the complex nature of commercial insurance products could affect the sale of lumbering RBS with underpriced long-term liabilities.
 
The bank's insurance business saw profits tumble heavily last year on the back of mounting personal injury claims on motor policies.
 
Steve Langan, managing director at RBS rival Hiscox, said: "The liability cover that they are proposing to sell can have up to a 40-year tail. It's got a horrible 'here we go again' feel about it. It's fine if you're selling tins of beans, but this is long-term liability insurance. It can be very toxic for a very long time if you underprice it."
READ MORE - RBS goes for broke with business insurance grab

Health insurance coverage drops

Health insurers want to see a discussion about ways to encourage greater self-provision in health care.
 
The call comes after a year in which the number of New Zealanders covered by health insurance fell by 10,000 to 1.38 million.
 
Total claims rose $60m from 2009 to $825m in 2010, while premium income rose $87m to $962m.
 
Health Funds Association of New Zealand executive director Roger Styles said public health spending was growing at double the rate of private health insurance spending, which was the opposite direction to other countries in the developed countries' organisation the OECD.
 
In 2008, the OECD average private contribution to health spending had been 28 per cent, in Australia it had been 32 per cent, and in this country the private contribution to total health spending dipped below 19.6 percent.
 
The gap between this country and the rest of the OECD had widened from 4.6 per cent in 2001 to 8.2 per cent by 2008, Mr Styles said in the association's newsletter.
 
Between 2004 and 2010, the amount spent by the Government on health rose from $7.6 billion to $12.7 billion, an increase of 41 per cent when adjusted for inflation.
 
In the same period, private health insurance premium income grew from $646m to $918m, an inflation adjusted increase of 20 per cent.
 
"If this imbalance is left to continue, it would see New Zealand moving in the opposite direction to other OECD countries, at precisely the wrong time," Mr Styles said.
 
"The twin forces of an aging population and global recession mean we have a small window of opportunity to explore policies which help move New Zealand towards a more balanced health system.
 
"Most OECD countries recognise there are merits in people making provision for their health care and actively encourage health insurance by a range of means, with various degrees of carrot and stick," Mr Styles said.
 
"New Zealand is alone in not only being devoid of any incentive, but actively penalising those employers who fund a portion of health insurance costs for their employees.
 
"The time is right to have another look at how we can encourage greater self-provision in health care."
READ MORE - Health insurance coverage drops

Maps change who needs flood insurance

In five months, new federal flood hazard maps for New London County will take effect, and homeowners in or near flood zones are being urged to view the maps now and, if necessary, buy flood insurance before the bank holding their mortgage tells them to.
 
"It could be cost-effective to buy a policy ahead of the map change," said Diane Ifkovic, environmental analyst with the state Department of Environmental Protection who oversees the National Flood Insurance program for Connecticut.
 
Local town halls have large paper versions of the new maps, which will be available digitally on FEMA's Map Service Center website by July 18. The new maps replace ones issued in 1984 that were far less detailed and accurate. For the new maps, better data on average precipitation and hydraulics - the structures and landscape features that control water flows - was used, said David Mendelsohn, FEMA risk analyst. Data from last spring's flooding was not used, because it occurred after the drafts were completed.
 
Homeowners in coastal, riverfront and other flood-prone areas are advised to contact their town halls and make arrangements to see the new map with their property.
 
"We'll go over the maps with them," Mark Wujtewicz, Waterford planner, said Friday. About 25 homeowners have already done so, after reading a legal notice.
 
He and other local officials said a relatively small number of properties will see any change. In one example in Waterford, a few lots on Daniels Avenue and Beach Street along the Niantic River are now shown to be in a higher flood risk area than previously. The town, Wujtewicz said, had no disagreement with FEMA's conclusions on which areas were most flood-prone.
 
"There's nothing that sticks out as being absurd," he said.
 
Ifkovic and officials at the Federal Emergency Management Agency's New England office said once the maps take effect July 18, banks will check them and could require any mortgage holders who appear for the first time in areas identified as flood-prone to get insurance. It could work the other way, too - a property shown in a flood zone in the old maps, from 1984, could be out in the new version. Federal flood insurance typically costs $600 to $2,000, Ifkovic said, depending on the size of the house and whether it's located on the coast or inland.
 
"Some people may find their flood risk is greater or less than it was previously," said Lauren Palik of FEMA's flood plain management and insurance branch.
 
The new maps use aerial photographs that show individual streets and houses with flood zone markings superimposed. Areas with the highest hazard are shaded to connote they have a 1 percent chance of flooding in any given year, and those with a lower flood risk as having a 0.2 percent chance of flooding in a particular year. (The percentage system replaces FEMA's 100-year and 500-year flood designation terminology.) The maps also single out coastal areas vulnerable to flooding from wave action during storms.
 
Joe Larkin, the zoning enforcement officer for Stonington, said the new maps are much easier to use in trying to determine whether a particular property is in a flood zone. He estimated that 95 percent of the properties in his town that were in a flood zone before are still in one, but "a few are out of it, and others that had been considered to be out will be in. Those are the ones who really need to be aware."
 
The Lord's Point section of town, he said, is among areas seeing the most change.
 
Tom Sanders, Montville zoning officer and flood plain administrator, said in comparing the old and new maps, he has seen only a few parcels where the flood zone markings have moved, and none of the changes affect homes. Like other towns, Montville is now in the process of revising the language in zoning regulations so that it will match the new terminology used in the new maps.
 
In Groton, the Poquonnock Bridge neighborhood along Midway Oval is one that may benefit from the new maps. In the old map, it was in the highest-risk flood zone, but now it's in the lower category.
 
The opposite happened along parts of River Road in the Mystic section. The high flood-risk zone moved inland from the old maps to cover a slightly larger area. Pearl Street, previously in the low-risk zone, is now in a higher-risk area.
 
In Old Mystic, the old maps leave out most of Whitford Brook and the surrounding areas. In the new one, the brook is shown, with land on both sides in the high risk flood zone.
 
Matthew Davis, manager of planning services, said the town notified dozens of homeowners who might be affected by the map changes. About 150 turned out to a meeting to learn about them, so he's confident most residents are aware who need to be.
READ MORE - Maps change who needs flood insurance

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
 
 
 

Total Pageviews