RBS goes for broke with business insurance grab

The bank's insurance arm - one of the largest players in the market - said it was merely trying to "provide support in challenging times".
 
The statement came after competitors accused it of undercutting the market in a bid to bulk-up prior to a sale or stock market flotation.
 
The bank's commercial insurance arm NIG has written to brokers offering to undercut competitor's premiums by up to 5pc and increase commissions by 3pc in order to win new business.
 
The "Guaranteed to Beat" deal, which runs throughout March and April, is targeting competitors including Ageas, Aviva and RSA and also offers other incentives to brokers such as M&S vouchers and Apple iPads.
 
Rivals have attacked the move and called it "over-the-cliff madness from a taxpayer-owned company".
 
Related Articles
 
 
 
RBS has been ordered to sell or float a string of assets by European regulators after it received billions of pounds of taxpayers' money at the height of the financial crisis. A spokesman for RBS denied that the offer is unreasonable: "We make no apology for providing innovative support to SMEs and supporting our customers in challenging times. This is a profitable product in a niche market."
 
However, other insurers say the complex nature of commercial insurance products could affect the sale of lumbering RBS with underpriced long-term liabilities.
 
The bank's insurance business saw profits tumble heavily last year on the back of mounting personal injury claims on motor policies.
 
Steve Langan, managing director at RBS rival Hiscox, said: "The liability cover that they are proposing to sell can have up to a 40-year tail. It's got a horrible 'here we go again' feel about it. It's fine if you're selling tins of beans, but this is long-term liability insurance. It can be very toxic for a very long time if you underprice it."
READ MORE - RBS goes for broke with business insurance grab

Health insurance coverage drops

Health insurers want to see a discussion about ways to encourage greater self-provision in health care.
 
The call comes after a year in which the number of New Zealanders covered by health insurance fell by 10,000 to 1.38 million.
 
Total claims rose $60m from 2009 to $825m in 2010, while premium income rose $87m to $962m.
 
Health Funds Association of New Zealand executive director Roger Styles said public health spending was growing at double the rate of private health insurance spending, which was the opposite direction to other countries in the developed countries' organisation the OECD.
 
In 2008, the OECD average private contribution to health spending had been 28 per cent, in Australia it had been 32 per cent, and in this country the private contribution to total health spending dipped below 19.6 percent.
 
The gap between this country and the rest of the OECD had widened from 4.6 per cent in 2001 to 8.2 per cent by 2008, Mr Styles said in the association's newsletter.
 
Between 2004 and 2010, the amount spent by the Government on health rose from $7.6 billion to $12.7 billion, an increase of 41 per cent when adjusted for inflation.
 
In the same period, private health insurance premium income grew from $646m to $918m, an inflation adjusted increase of 20 per cent.
 
"If this imbalance is left to continue, it would see New Zealand moving in the opposite direction to other OECD countries, at precisely the wrong time," Mr Styles said.
 
"The twin forces of an aging population and global recession mean we have a small window of opportunity to explore policies which help move New Zealand towards a more balanced health system.
 
"Most OECD countries recognise there are merits in people making provision for their health care and actively encourage health insurance by a range of means, with various degrees of carrot and stick," Mr Styles said.
 
"New Zealand is alone in not only being devoid of any incentive, but actively penalising those employers who fund a portion of health insurance costs for their employees.
 
"The time is right to have another look at how we can encourage greater self-provision in health care."
READ MORE - Health insurance coverage drops

Maps change who needs flood insurance

In five months, new federal flood hazard maps for New London County will take effect, and homeowners in or near flood zones are being urged to view the maps now and, if necessary, buy flood insurance before the bank holding their mortgage tells them to.
 
"It could be cost-effective to buy a policy ahead of the map change," said Diane Ifkovic, environmental analyst with the state Department of Environmental Protection who oversees the National Flood Insurance program for Connecticut.
 
Local town halls have large paper versions of the new maps, which will be available digitally on FEMA's Map Service Center website by July 18. The new maps replace ones issued in 1984 that were far less detailed and accurate. For the new maps, better data on average precipitation and hydraulics - the structures and landscape features that control water flows - was used, said David Mendelsohn, FEMA risk analyst. Data from last spring's flooding was not used, because it occurred after the drafts were completed.
 
Homeowners in coastal, riverfront and other flood-prone areas are advised to contact their town halls and make arrangements to see the new map with their property.
 
"We'll go over the maps with them," Mark Wujtewicz, Waterford planner, said Friday. About 25 homeowners have already done so, after reading a legal notice.
 
He and other local officials said a relatively small number of properties will see any change. In one example in Waterford, a few lots on Daniels Avenue and Beach Street along the Niantic River are now shown to be in a higher flood risk area than previously. The town, Wujtewicz said, had no disagreement with FEMA's conclusions on which areas were most flood-prone.
 
"There's nothing that sticks out as being absurd," he said.
 
Ifkovic and officials at the Federal Emergency Management Agency's New England office said once the maps take effect July 18, banks will check them and could require any mortgage holders who appear for the first time in areas identified as flood-prone to get insurance. It could work the other way, too - a property shown in a flood zone in the old maps, from 1984, could be out in the new version. Federal flood insurance typically costs $600 to $2,000, Ifkovic said, depending on the size of the house and whether it's located on the coast or inland.
 
"Some people may find their flood risk is greater or less than it was previously," said Lauren Palik of FEMA's flood plain management and insurance branch.
 
The new maps use aerial photographs that show individual streets and houses with flood zone markings superimposed. Areas with the highest hazard are shaded to connote they have a 1 percent chance of flooding in any given year, and those with a lower flood risk as having a 0.2 percent chance of flooding in a particular year. (The percentage system replaces FEMA's 100-year and 500-year flood designation terminology.) The maps also single out coastal areas vulnerable to flooding from wave action during storms.
 
Joe Larkin, the zoning enforcement officer for Stonington, said the new maps are much easier to use in trying to determine whether a particular property is in a flood zone. He estimated that 95 percent of the properties in his town that were in a flood zone before are still in one, but "a few are out of it, and others that had been considered to be out will be in. Those are the ones who really need to be aware."
 
The Lord's Point section of town, he said, is among areas seeing the most change.
 
Tom Sanders, Montville zoning officer and flood plain administrator, said in comparing the old and new maps, he has seen only a few parcels where the flood zone markings have moved, and none of the changes affect homes. Like other towns, Montville is now in the process of revising the language in zoning regulations so that it will match the new terminology used in the new maps.
 
In Groton, the Poquonnock Bridge neighborhood along Midway Oval is one that may benefit from the new maps. In the old map, it was in the highest-risk flood zone, but now it's in the lower category.
 
The opposite happened along parts of River Road in the Mystic section. The high flood-risk zone moved inland from the old maps to cover a slightly larger area. Pearl Street, previously in the low-risk zone, is now in a higher-risk area.
 
In Old Mystic, the old maps leave out most of Whitford Brook and the surrounding areas. In the new one, the brook is shown, with land on both sides in the high risk flood zone.
 
Matthew Davis, manager of planning services, said the town notified dozens of homeowners who might be affected by the map changes. About 150 turned out to a meeting to learn about them, so he's confident most residents are aware who need to be.
READ MORE - Maps change who needs flood insurance

State may be hit with disaster insurance

QUEENSLAND has been issued its strongest warning yet that it may be forced to take out costly disaster insurance that could further cripple the state's struggling budget.
 
The matter, that will potentially cost Queensland billions, is a likely trading card for Prime Minister Julia Gillard, who needs to secure the support of Senator Nick Xenophon to get her controversial $1.8 billion flood levy through the Parliament.
 
Senator Xenophon is holding out, determined to make a deal that will effectively force Queensland to take out expensive disaster insurance.
 
Yesterday, Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan and Finance Minister Penny Wong both signalled the Government was closely considering the matter.
 
"I think it is probably timely for us to evaluate (the insurance issue), to have a good hard look ... to see what the implications for the future are," Mr Swan told Network 10.
 
Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
 
End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
 
Queensland chose not to reinsure for disasters, with the Government preferring to rely instead on a long-held deal whereby the Commonwealth will cover up to 75 per cent of the damage bill.
 
But state Treasurer Andrew Fraser said no Australian state had the type of insurance that would cover the costs of Queensland's 2011 summer of disaster.
 
"It is important for Senator Xenophon to understand that getting reinsurance for Queensland is an entirely different proposition than getting reinsurance for South Australia," Mr Fraser said.
 
"Queenslanders are relying on Canberra politicians to pass the disaster funding package so we can accelerate the recovery and reconstruction effort."
 
Speculation is mounting that the Federal Government might propose funding disincentives for states without insurance, in terms of limiting access to the national disaster fund. Senator Xenophon welcomed the idea.
 
"Now's the time to fix this up so that taxpayers aren't left with a future bill for any other natural disasters," he said.
READ MORE - State may be hit with disaster insurance

Insurance cover for army personnel increased

Extending a better life insurance cover for its personnel, Indian Army has increased the Army Group Insurance Fund (AGIF) by Rs. 10 lakh and Rs. 5 lakh for its 35,000 officers and over one million jawans respectively.
 
"The government has taken a decision to increase the AGIF coverage for soldiers in the Army. Under the new scheme, the officers would avail coverage of Rs 40 lakh, while the same has been increased to Rs. 20 lakh for jawans," Defence Ministry officials told PTI.
 
The premium amount payable by the soldiers has also been increased accordingly.
 
Now jawans would have to pay a minimum of Rs. 2000 annually while earlier they were paying between Rs. 600 to Rs. 1000.
 
For officers, the same amount has been increased from Rs. 2000 to Rs. 4000.
 
"It is the minimum deduction from the salary of soldiers and after the sixth pay commission soldiers are contributing even more voluntarily," the officials said.
 
The decision, which would come into effect from April 1, was pending with the Ministry for quite some time.
 
Earlier, the officers were provided an insurance package of Rs. 30 lakh and for the Personnel Below Officer Ranks (PBORs), it was Rs. 15 lakh.
 
"The policy was pending with the ministry and its concerned department for review and the Army had mentioned few important points to raise the insurance limits," officials said.
 
While counter-insurgency operations in Jammu and Kashmir and North-East region have always been a major task for the Army, its role during disasters and natural calamities across the country, has further increased the stress on its men.
 
"The soldiers posted in difficult terrain and elsewhere must believe that the organisation is taking care of the basic needs of his family.
 
"Besides, there are issues of rising prices and meeting the requirements of good education and health for the old parents. It takes out a lot of stress and even motivates him to perform better," officials said.
 
Over the years, a number of new monetary measures have been initiated by the Indian army to ensure better life and facilities for the family members of its soldiers.
 
The focus has been mainly on ensuring good education for the children and re-employment of the soldier in case of disability during action.
 
Various options have been made available for the children from military background.
 
Along with education loans, soldiers get due assistance from Army Welfare Corpus in form of scholarship, tuition fee and higher technical education through educational institutions run by the army.
 
"There are provisions for covering the tuition fee and the cost of books for children pursuing professional courses.
 
"A significant amount is spent by the army in ensuring these measures. It is very important for the organisation to take care of the family members specially parents and children so that he can perform his tasks well," officials said.
READ MORE - Insurance cover for army personnel increased

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
 
 
 

Total Pageviews